Wireless Tech Chat

If you’re on the road in Illinois and need to stop and take a breather before you move on, your time at the rest area WILL NOT include the opportunity to access the web wirelessly.

According to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), a plan to offer wireless access to visitors (does one actually “visit” a rest stop?) at interstate rest stops has been shelved for now because not a single vendor submitted a bid for consideration. This is the second time IDOT has put the project out for bid, and after a vendor failed to attend a meeting, they were disqualified.

Obviously, the fact that no one is lining up to provide WiFi service at rest stops, plus there doesn’t seem to be a great public demand for it, would give state officials the impression that it really isn’t worth the effort to pursue this initiative any further. However, there are some slight indications that another RFP will be issued, but it looks like no one will be beating down the door to be considered.

[Via Chicago Tribune]

Yet another big-city wireless network falls by the wayside. AT&T has informed St. Louis city officials that they are killing their plans to develop and deploy a muni WiFi network that was supposed to roll out over the next two years.

According to the company, high costs and technical issues were behind their decision. The plan, as described by AT&T, was to mount transmitters on the city’s 51,000 streetlights, but the problem was that many of them are not powered during the day. Other methods of bringing network signals to the masses were considered, such as mounting them on various infrastructure spread througout the area, but all of them were too costly for both the city and AT&T to commit to, so the decision was made to scrap the whole thing.

Just like other major cities including San Francisco and Chicago, the path to muni WiFi, which was once on an upward swing, is now struggling to stay afloat. As discussed in an earlier post, the Corpus Christi, Texas network model may be the one to simulate by cities big and small moving forward, but all eyes will also be on Philadelphia as mass roll out of its own wireless network which, ironically, is being built and managed by EarthLink, the poster child for the roller-coaster ride that is citywide wireless, will get underway by the end of this year into next year. If the Philly network can prove effective, then maybe, just maybe, muni WiFi can get back on its feet.

[Via NetworkWorld]

The Hawaii State Capitol facility is now completely wireless as the second phase of a $400,000 project earmarked for unwiring the legislative facility has been completed.

The first part of the project provided wireless access to all of the House and Senate conference rooms and print shops, the Capitol Auditorium, and corridors along the railings on the second, third and fourth floors. The recently completed phase now will allow for all legislative member offices, chambers, and inner corridors the ability to link into the network as well.

This certainly bodes well for similar types of niche wireless networks, particularly in government or business complexes where there is enough of a potential user base to support it. Whether this kind of project would expand outward to the citizenship at large is another matter, but this could spark activity among wireless providers to seek similar opportunities.

[Via BizJournals.com]

Well, things aren’t ALL bad for wireless networks. The Springfield, Missouri city council announced this week that the downtown wireless network will continue to be funded, despite opposition by one councilman.

The network, which was developed and is currently managed by City Utilities, allows for free web access for users who are in the core area of downtown Springfield. The netowrk has been in place since 2005, and the city and the county (Greene County, to be exact) are sharing the annual operating cost of slightly over $10,000 with two other Springfield community groups.

Although the $10,000 annual cost is a mere pittance to most municipalities when it comes to operating a wireless network, Councilman Doug Burlison, who voted against the funding, says that the city should not be into the business of funding wireless networks with tax dollars.

Burlison would have a stronger argument if the annual cost was $1,000,000, but quibbling over $10,000 seems a bit petty. But, he is not alone when it comes to voicing a concern over cities getting too financially tied to the development and deployment of a muni WiFi network. The model that calls for providing free access with the expectation that advertisers will flock to the network to sell their goods and services is pretty much a failure–of course, there are some exceptions, but not enough of them to warrant a reversal of opinion.

Cities are also being cautious about becoming anchor tenants in these networks, so the wireless providers AND the cities who give them the opportunity to bid on a project must at the outset make it plain to the potential user base that this initiative is going to cost money, and the way to recoup those costs is to charge a monthly access fee.

Although users may object, the fact remains that purchasing access to a citywide wireless network is a choice, NOT a requirement. If you can prefer to access the wireless internet at a Starbucks or anyplace else that offers it, you certainly have the right to do so.

[Via News-Leader.com]

The proposed wireless network for the city of Sacramento, California has hit another brick wall with the announcement that Sacramento Metro Connect LLC, the vendor chosed by the city council, that it has not secured enough funding to start building the network.

Estimates were that between $7 million and $9 million would be needed to fund the project, which was supposed to be up and running by October 2009.

It wasn’t that long ago that the city backed out of a deal with MobilePro Inc. because the city did not want to become an anchor
tenant of the network, thereby not putting itself into a situation where they would be financially responsible for the network to remain afloat.

Sacramento certainly has tried everything to establish a wireless network for its citizens, but financial concerns as well as the lack of a stable business model has pretty much rendered the concept null and void, at least for the forseeable future.

Unless a few businesses decide to invest in the network, or if there is a major change in philosophy by a majority of city officials, it appears that muni WiFi is a dead issue in this city.

The Bay Area and Northern California have not been having an easy go of it this year when it comes to muni WiFi. The San Francisco network has been in a state of flux since EarthLink pulled out of the project, the Silicon Valley network is also under a great deal of scrutiny, and now with Sacramento added to the mix, the supposed technology bellwether region of the United States has not lived up to its reputation, as far as muni WiFi is concerned.

[Via SFGate.com]

The proposed wireless network for Grand Rapids, Michigan, which is being based on WiMax technology, is not likely to be up and running until around the middle of next year, says a city official.

Clearwire inked a deal with the city to have a network up by the end of this year, but they are running behind schedule, although there are no specifics as to why the city and the potential user base have to wait until mid-2008. There have been some indications that Clearwire’s technology partners, Motorola and Intel, are not developing the equipment necessary to handle WiMax signals fast enough to satisfy the original deadline, but as the project manager, Clearwire takes ultimate responsibility for what happens with regard to the network.

When the network is finally ready to roll, there are some interesting aspects to it that may spur other municipalities to copy what Grand Rapids and Clearwire are looking to do with it. For example, Clearwire will establish WiFi hotspots at various locations throughout the city for those users who choose not to upgrade their computers to work in the WiMax network environment.

In addition, the local government plans to leverage the netowrk to allow emergency responders to access information while positioned throughout the city. The contract also will allow Clearwire to access local infrastructure, including water towers, to position equipment.

The company also says it will provide discounted network service for qualified low-income residents, so the concept of “bridging the digital divide” still lives on, at least in this particular scenario.

[Via MLive.com]

A new report by the Heartland Institute may be the salve that muni WiFi supporters will need to heal the cuts and bruises they have been subjected to over the last few months with regard to the decline of citywide wireless projects across the country.

According to the report, the city of Corpus Christi, Texas seems to be going about it the right way and could end up being the model for future AND current muni WiFi projects. There are quite a few projects going on right now that have been sputtering–most notably, San Francisco–and it might be a good idea for project champions to analyze what Corpus Christi (pop. 300,000) is doing and base their own efforts from that model.

Some highlights, along with my own interpretations, of the report include:

• Cities and municipalities need to take a more “measured approach” in developing and deploying a wireless network. If you promise much, you have to deliver more.
• Focus on what you can provide–if your goal is to streamline government services, then do what you can to achieve that goal. Concepts such as providing universal access and “bridging the digital divide” are just too lofty to reach at the outset. Providing mobile access for local authorities to access information is a great place to start.
• If you’re going to issue an RFP, make sure that what you ask for is realistic. Remember that providers are in it for profit (why wouldn’t they be?), so they will be more than likely to say “yes” to most or all of your requests without question. Being skeptical would be helpful in this case.
• Both parties–local governments and providers–need to be upfront and honest as to how much building the network will cost, and who exactly is going to pay for it. The free access concept just isn’t feasible–users are more than willing to pay for it if they know what they’re going to get.

If muni WiFi is going to survive, it has to undergo a behavioral change and forget about how “cool” it is and get down to basics.

OK, aren’t we taking this WiFi hotspot locator thing a bit too far?

ThinkGeek has introduced its WiFi Detector Shirt, which claims to be able to show wearers and starers how strong a signal that a nearby WiFi hotspot is sending. The company sellls all kinds of apparel and gadgets that appeal to tech-happy folks, so why should anyone be surprised about a hotspot detecting t-shirt? There are keychains and other types of devices that can locate WiFi signals, so what’s wrong with making it a fashion statement?

Nothing really when you get down to it, but when you consider that this t-shirt sells for $29.99, and you have to purchase three AAA batteries separately since the shirt’s light display uses a battery pack sewn within the shirt, and that it comes with fairly detailed washing instructions, you have to wonder where the line is between
being cool or being looked at with askance.

Of course, it only comes in black (naturally). It would be safe to assume that most purchasers would wear this shirt with black jeans and black boots to add to the “WiFi Rebel” look. I love how in the washing instructions that you are urged to “unplug the battery pack and remove it” before sticking it into the washing machine. You know, if they didn’t mention it, The picture of WiFi Detector wearers having to dig AAA batteries out of their washing machines (either at Mom’s house or at the laundrymat) just keeps sticking in my mind…

As a suggested fashion accessory, check out the Computer SnoopTek Stick over at our 451Press blog, Gadget Dose.

[Via Arstechnica.com]

The recent departure of Sprint Nextel’s chairman and CEO Gary Forsee may end up putting a major snag in the company’s plan to build a national WiMax network, which is said to be valued at around $5 billion.

Many wireless companies like Sprint are looking for new revenue streams to augment their traditional cellphone service businesses, so a a natural progression would be to turn to providing broadband wireless service, either through WiFi or, in this case, WiMax. It was only a few months ago that Sprint took the plunge into WiMax, and now things may get a little dicey.

In the immediate term, a wireless network being built by both Sprint and Motorola for the city of Chicago may be affected by the boardroom turmoil, although spokespeople from both companies say that work is still ongoing and on schedule. However, if a major corporation is going to be spending a good deal of time seeking new executive leadership, how much attention is going to be paid to this one single project?

There has been talk that Sprint may spin off its WiMax development business unit, Xohm, into a separate company, which on the surface should keep the people and projects associated with it away from the corporate shenanigans, but inevitably spin-offs nearly always get distracted by the parent company at one time or another. Why would this situation be any different?

However, this is all just speculation when you get right down to it. Sprint may just decide to forge ahead with their WiMax plans because “traditional” citywide wireless networks are struggling and the market opportunity is definitely there for the taking.

[Via Chicago Tribune]

The rapid decline of enthusiasm for citywide wireless networks continues to draw (unwanted) attention with reports indicating this week that MetroFi Inc. has told the city of Portland, Oregon that it plans to stop work on the build-out of the city’s network unless there is more money to fund it, provided either by the city or the company’s investors.

In the best-case scenario, MetroFi would want the city to be an anchor tenant but, like most city governments are doing, the mayor and other local government leaders are questioning whether it would be wise to make that kind of financial commitment without the guarantee of wide usage by residents and businesses.

It truly is amazing how far and how fast the concept of muni WiFi has fallen. You can attribute it to a number of factors, including the decline of Earthlink, who was THE major player in the development and deployment of said networks; the subsequent collapse of the San Francisco wireless network; and pointed questions as to how these networks are going to be financed, particularly if local governments balk at becoming anchor tenants or giving the thumbs-up to providers to apply usage fees.

Although many people would say that the citywide wireless network idea should just fade out and that public-access WiFi should grow through independent hotspots, there still is a chance the concept will work. However, there really needs to be a coming together of industry experts, technology supporters, and government and business leaders to sit down and come up with a workable model that municipalities of all sizes can support. It’s either that, or say goodnight to muni WiFi.

[Via The Oregonian]